This page will forward to the new random process site in seconds.
Go now! | Stay here!

I <3 MacFanatics®

Yep, I know what you're thinking, why that registered symbol beside MacFanatics? Well I'm pretty sure They've patented the name for themselves or something, they're that Apple-like. (ok, so maybe that's not entirely true...) I will dedicate this article to the Apple fans of this planet. They're not the normal type of fans you would see following the band bus or whatever. Instead they would pay to grovel at the feet of Steve Jobs or get shot with a potato canon to receive an Ipod. Trust me, it's been done!

Apple is a very unique company. The company was started by Steven Wozniak and Steven Jobs, who were both high school drop-outs. They had previously dabbled in the computing world, but it wasn't until Wozniak created the Apple I that their computer careers really took off. The first Apple computers were quite an improvement over the then-current PC. It was much more user-friendly and many features we see in Windows nowadays and take for granted originated with the Mac.

For many years Macs enjoyed great success, especially in the classrooms. If you search around, you'll probably find some school libraries with Macs in them still! All was grand and happy in AppleLand, but it was not to last.

You see, the PC industry and Apple had different thoughts in mind. Apple wanted to continue being "revolutionary" while the PC industry was happy with just evolving. So what happened was PCs dropped in price so that almost everyone (in the first world at least) could afford one while Macs were segregated to a more niche market. They were still very user-friendly, usually more so than the PCs with Windows. Unfortunately for Apple, people soon realized they didn't need a multi-gigahertz machine just to scroll through word documents and emails. They didn't need powerful, expensive computers to do what they needed to do. The PC industry (minus Apple) realized this and marketed the mainstream computer heavily. These were the $500 jobbies that you picked up at the local corner store (well, ok, BestBuy or something along those lines) and took home to get by with. They weren't blazing fast, weren't extremely user-friendly, and didn't look like they could be put on a fashion runway. Instead, they were adequate for what the majority did and that was good enough.

So it was companies like Dell that stole all the PC market share while Apple was busy tooting its next new system that was see-through or had different colors on the casing. Whoopdeeeffingdoo. If I want to have some visual excitement, I'll go stare at a bright light or something. I don't need my computer to look like it's on drugs... So what does Apple do once it sees that almost no one want its computers?

It makes the damn Ipod.

And god was that a success. Even I have one. Well, I had to try it out and I must say, it's definitely a fad. Since then, I've picked up a Creative Zen Micro and I've been much happier with it than with the Ipod. The Ipod (and almost everything Apple makes) is damn pretty that's for sure, but it's both expensive and you get less than competing products. Apple is riding a wave of great marketing and Ipod recognition. People may not think much about Apple's computers but you can almost be sure that they'll at least have heard of the Ipod. It has been a great success for Apple and I can see it being a very big portion of their revenue base in the future as well.

And that finally brings me to the real topic: those MacFanatics. You see them around in small packs usually. There's not too many of them, but they sure can grab attention. In the forums they're the people that essentially plug their ears and eyes to the rest of the computer world and repeat to themselves that Apple is their savior. It's like a religion to them. 'The G5 is xx% faster than anything else', 'the Powerbook is all you need; it'll even cook breakfast for you'. However, if they would only take a look around, they would realize just how blinded they've become. I'm not saying everything Apple is crap. Far from it; I've got my Windows system set up to look like MacOSX. However, I don't intend to move to a Mac. Oh I've thought about trying them out (especially when the Mac Mini was launched) but I realized I have no need. All of the programs I run are Windows-based (some Linux too) and I'm not that much of a sucker for looks (in computers anyways). The G5 is fast enough for me, but don't go around saying it's the fastest PC. It's not. I can build you one that is both faster and costs less as long as you let me put it in a different case. It's as simple as that.

So what am I really saying? Apple is a company that had (has) great ideas for innovation. Unfortunately, they're innovating in the wrong direction and they're targeting the wrong demography. If they really want to gain market share, they must convert Windows users. Pleasing the current fanbase will only do so much. The Mac Mini was a good start, but they're far from turning me over to the dark side. Until then, I'll have my fun reading what those MacFanatics® have to say.
« Home | Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »

Blogger Rene wrote at 5/12/2005 7:44 PM

ouch. that hurt.

but you're mistaken in your last arguement about you being able to build a faster machine because you're probably suffering from the (dun dun dun....) "megahertz myth". just because the new iMac's only clock up to 2Ghz doesn't mean their 3.4Ghz Windoze counterparts are faster. You have to delve deeper into the computer than just the processor.

on average, when it comes down to the numbers game, mac's can get the job done much faster than a windows machine. example: on a mac, playing halo, you get something like 1.4 or 1.6 more frames per second then you do on a 3.4Ghz dell. and when using adobe a mac is 95% faster than a 3.6GHz Pentium 4-based system.

and the iPod isn't really a fad. it's true, it's the hottest gadget to have right now, but it'll never lose it's practicallity. and even though there might be better products out there (piff, yeah right....) the iPod will always get bought because of it's simplicity and it's intergration with the #1 online music store, iTunes. Why else do you think that the iPod shuffle has a 58% market share of the flash mp3 player market, and that the iPod and iPod mini have 90% of the hdd market?

But enough of my fanboying.    



Blogger Charlie wrote at 5/12/2005 9:19 PM

Ok agree with your Ipod statements about market share. It does have a a very commanding lead, which I don't see it losing in the near future; however I do think that mp3 players in general are going to soon be a bygone product. I think they'll be integrated with organizers/cell phones and that they'll be more popular in the future.

As for the faster than the G5 comment. Trust me on this, I wasn't thinking about the P4 at all. Instead I was thinking about a dual Opteron system. They're fairly expensive but still less expensive than a G5. For example:

Antec P160 Aluminum case
2x Opteron 252 (2.6GHz
ASUS K8N-DL Dual 940 socket
2x1GB PC3200 RAM
16X DVD+-RW
2x400GB SATA HDD
ATi X800XT AIW 256MB
520W PSU
Logitech LX700

Comes out to ~$3500USD while a similarily configured G5 would cost $4574. And yes, the Opterons are faster clock per clock than the G5s. Also, when the dual Athlon64 X2s are actually available for sale, this system would be even cheaper with almost the same performance level.

So yes, COOKED!    



Blogger Rene wrote at 5/12/2005 11:19 PM

no way. remember a few years ago there was a commercial for a cell phone mp3 player? it tanked, and in europe the all-in-one has been selling extrememly poorly.

steve jobs realizes that what people want is one thing that does one thing extremely well, rather than a lot of stuff half-assed.

nokia is going to be coming out with a cell phone mp3 player around christmas, and there are images of it floating all over the internet, and quite frankly it looks ugly.

as for your computer system, there is such a thing as overkill. I mean come on chuck! 800Gb hard drive? How much porn are you going to download?

Personally, I would prefer to have a PC desktop and an apple laptop. That's why I'm eagerly awaiting the speed bump in the iBook line, hopefully it'll follow in the same vein as the iMac G5 lineup.    



» Post a Comment